A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Illegal string offset 'set_all_segments'

Filename: extensions/ext.low_seg2cat.php

Line Number: 134

MN2020 - Stadium or Not, Environmental Concerns Remain At Arden Hills
Archive Hosted by the AFL-CIO

Stadium or Not, Environmental Concerns Remain At Arden Hills

January 09, 2012 By Will Nissen, Fellow

Stadium or not, the proposed Arden Hills site is an environmental mess that needs attention regardless of what's developed there.

Here's a brief background on the issue so far. Back in May, the Ramsey County Board, with the Vikings' support, unveiled a $1.1 billion stadium proposal to build the team's new home in Arden Hills.

By November, the County entered into a deal to purchase the 430-acre site from the federal government for a less-than-projected $28.5 million (read the entire purchase agreement here).

In December, Ramsey County published a request for qualifications (which precedes a request for proposals) seeking architectural and engineering services, to provide "unique opportunities to firms interested in being a part of the stadium project."

On January 3rd, Ramsey County's board named Commissioner Raphael Ortega, one of the biggest Arden Hills stadium site supporters, as its new chair; and although his new position may not sway the commission's stadium opponents, he will undoubtedly make efforts to publicize and promote the Arden Hills site in the Vikings stadium debate.

In spite of these efforts, the future of a stadium in Arden Hills is far from guaranteed. The Vikings continually say they prefer the Arden Hills site; however, multiple Ramsey County public financing obstacles have given new life to a Minneapolis site as a plan B.

As a result, Minneapolis mayor R.T. Rybak continues pushing his city's two main proposals: remodeling the current Metrodome location and a site near Target Field.

Meanwhile, Minnesota's legislature, who is largely responsible for determining how the state's portion of the stadium costs will be financed, is still weighing both financing and location options.

But underneath the debate over whether or not to build a new stadium at Arden Hills lays the site itself. The proposed 430 acre site is part of the larger 2,400 acre Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) land area. Minnesota's largest Superfund site currently resides on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL) due to nasty chemicals released during its 35 years as the U.S. Army's testing, manufacturing and ammunition disabling facility.

Since the mid-1980s, the  EPA, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Army have made considerable efforts to clean up, monitor and control soil and groundwater contamination. But final stages of the cleanup need to be completed and continued monitoring must be done through 2040 to finalize groundwater restoration and potentially remove the site from the NPL, according to the MPCA.

Details regarding who will be responsible for these cleanup and monitoring activities at the Superfund site, which are required under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), after the Ramsey County purchase goes through are complicated.

Because the Army is considered the responsible party for the soil and water contaminations, it has, with help from the EPA and MPCA, been largely responsible for cleanup to this point. But according to the purchase agreement, once the 430 acres' ownership transfers to Ramsey County, it's responsible for the remaining soil contamination cleanup while the Army retains responsibility for groundwater cleanup and monitoring.

If the county sells the Vikings its desired 170-acre slice to build a stadium and supporting development, the team is responsible for environmental cleanup costs (and costs needed to potentially meet higher environmental standards) for those 170 acres, according the proposed plan laid out in May. Meanwhile, the County would continue paying cleanup costs on its remaining 260 acres. Appropriate completion of these requirements will be approved by the MPCA and, if needed, the EPA.

Now, not all of the Ramsey County Commissioners support building a new Vikings stadium at the Arden Hill site. The move to solicit a request for qualifications passed the Board by only a 4-3 vote, and Commissioner Victoria Reinhardt, Ortega’s predecessor as Chair, opposes the currently proposed tax-subsidized stadium plan.

Still, the November decision to purchase the 430-acre site from the federal government passed the Board unanimously. Even Commissioners who oppose the stadium acknowledge the potential of this land for commercial development, and the expansion of the existing Rice Creek wildlife corridor (see map of the proposed site purchase).

The site is a wasted brownfield that occupies the largest piece of undeveloped land in the Twin Cities and is a community eyesore. Something, stadium or otherwise, will be developed there in the future. While it is encouraging that there are requirements in writing to ensure that the environmental needs of the property are met, it can be easy for these requirements to get lost in the fray of political debates and public enthusiasm. Those who care about the safe and environmentally responsible use of this land should voice these concerns and hold the eventual owner of the Arden Hills site accountable to completing the cleanup and continued monitoring of the land.

Thanks for participating! Commenting on this conversation is now closed.

4 Comments:

  • Bernice Vetsch says:

    January 10, 2012 at 10:45 am

    As I understood the purchase of this land, the money paid to the county by the government was to be sufficient to cover all future cleanup needs. 

    However, if the time needed to complete the cleanup is 40 years, that could and should kill the idea of a stadium and Mr. Wylf’s “village” right now.

    The best offer around for the Vikings is to assume ownership of the Dome for only $1, and I say to heck with the idea that providing more parking for high-dollar seat holders is a necessary addition to the stadium.  And, since the team, pleading “hardship,”  hasn’t paid rent for ten years, would the upkeep be an even greater “hardship?” 

  • Dan says:

    January 10, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    When last polled, the people of MN overwhelmingly opposed building a new Vikings stadium.  Most of the articles and news reports I’ve seen lately, refer to it as basically a done deal with several proposed sites to choose from.  As far as I know, the people haven’t changed their minds and if our elected representatives foist a new stadium on us, then it’ll be done without our consent.  If the Vikings wanted to gain popular support for a new stadium, they made a big tactical error when they refused the offer to buy the dome for $1.  I hope that something like a wildlife refuge can be started on the Arden Hills site while decontamination of the land takes place.

  • Bernice Vetsch says:

    January 10, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    Dan:  If you live in Ramsey County and do NOT want residents of the county to carry the $300 billion (which becomes $600-plus billion over the decades it will take to pay it off), see www.nostadiumtax.org.

    Whether or not people support a stadium, a petition being circulated by the No Stadium Tax Coalition insists that any such obligation be submitted to the people for a vote rather than decided by a few supporters who happen to hold political office.

  • Brian says:

    February 2, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    You people who are against the Vikings getting a new stadium should be ashamed of yourselves.

    It just doesn’t make any sense to let a professional sports franchise leave the state, when it supplies this state with valuable revenue to, not just the team itself, but everything around where the team plays.

    Not to mention the fact that it supplies people with jobs and income, which they will turn around and effectively put back into the economy.

    Extra parking IS essential when talking about building a new stadium… because that will, in effect, bring in more people to the area who will spend more money… sure, people go to the games now, but not nearly as much money is being spent at local businesses simply because people struggle with the parking situation downtown.

    Arden Hills would also benefit from the multiple businesses that will sprout up in the area as a DIRECT result of the new stadium.

    It’s just sad to see that you people don’t see past it being more than just football… shame on you.